Thursday, June 28, 2007

Website of the Week

eBusiness Clubs provide you with information, advice and assistance to make your business perform better through its technology. As a Club member you can learn from and share your experiences with other businesses in your area. Also you receive complimentary information from leading ICT industry experts from both the private and public sector. Your local Club can help to reduce costs and improve time and resource efficiencies for your business.

Hat tip: Cassons

Starting a home based business?

Cost accounting on the global scene

By HAL R. VARIAN

Read original article

Who makes the Apple iPod? Here’s a hint: It is not Apple. The company outsources the entire manufacture of the device to a number of Asian enterprises, among them Asustek, Inventec Appliances and Foxconn.

But this list of companies isn’t a satisfactory answer either: They only do final assembly. What about the 451 parts that go into the iPod? Where are they made and by whom?

Three researchers at the University of California, Irvine — Greg Linden, Kenneth L. Kraemer and Jason Dedrick — applied some investigative cost accounting to this question, using a report from Portelligent Inc. that examined all the parts that went into the iPod.

Their study, sponsored by the Sloan Foundation, offers a fascinating illustration of the complexity of the global economy, and how difficult it is to understand that complexity by using only conventional trade statistics.

The retail value of the 30-gigabyte video iPod that the authors examined was $299. The most expensive component in it was the hard drive, which was manufactured by Toshiba and costs about $73. The next most costly components were the display module (about $20), the video/multimedia processor chip ($8) and the controller chip ($5). They estimated that the final assembly, done in China, cost only about $4 a unit.

One approach to tracing supply chain geography might be to attribute the cost of each component to the country of origin of its maker. So $73 of the cost of the iPod would be attributed to Japan since Toshiba is a Japanese company, and the $13 cost of the two chips would be attributed to the United States, since the suppliers, Broadcom and PortalPlayer, are American companies, and so on.

But this method hides some of the most important details. Toshiba may be a Japanese company, but it makes most of its hard drives in the Philippines and China. So perhaps we should also allocate part of the cost of that hard drive to one of those countries. The same problem arises regarding the Broadcom chips, with most of them manufactured in Taiwan. So how can one distribute the costs of the iPod components across the countries where they are manufactured in a meaningful way?

To answer this question, let us look at the production process as a sequence of steps, each possibly performed by a different company operating in a different country. At each step, inputs like computer chips and a bare circuit board are converted into outputs like an assembled circuit board. The difference between the cost of the inputs and the value of the outputs is the “value added” at that step, which can then be attributed to the country where that value was added.

The profit margin on generic parts like nuts and bolts is very low, since these items are produced in intensely competitive industries and can be manufactured anywhere. Hence, they add little to the final value of the iPod. More specialized parts, like the hard drives and controller chips, have much higher value added.

According to the authors’ estimates, the $73 Toshiba hard drive in the iPod contains about $54 in parts and labor. So the value that Toshiba added to the hard drive was $19 plus its own direct labor costs. This $19 is attributed to Japan since Toshiba is a Japanese company.

Continuing in this way, the researchers examined the major components of the iPod and tried to calculate the value added at different stages of the production process and then assigned that value added to the country where the value was created. This isn’t an easy task, but even based on their initial examination, it is quite clear that the largest share of the value added in the iPod goes to enterprises in the United States, particularly for units sold here.

The researchers estimated that $163 of the iPod’s $299 retail value in the United States was captured by American companies and workers, breaking it down to $75 for distribution and retail costs, $80 to Apple, and $8 to various domestic component makers. Japan contributed about $26 to the value added (mostly via the Toshiba disk drive), while Korea contributed less than $1.

The unaccounted-for parts and labor costs involved in making the iPod came to about $110. The authors hope to assign those labor costs to the appropriate countries, but as the hard drive example illustrates, that’s not so easy to do.

This value added calculation illustrates the futility of summarizing such a complex manufacturing process by using conventional trade statistics. Even though Chinese workers contribute only about 1 percent of the value of the iPod, the export of a finished iPod to the United States directly contributes about $150 to our bilateral trade deficit with the Chinese.

Ultimately, there is no simple answer to who makes the iPod or where it is made. The iPod, like many other products, is made in several countries by dozens of companies, with each stage of production contributing a different amount to the final value.

The real value of the iPod doesn’t lie in its parts or even in putting those parts together. The bulk of the iPod’s value is in the conception and design of the iPod. That is why Apple gets $80 for each of these video iPods it sells, which is by far the largest piece of value added in the entire supply chain.

Those clever folks at Apple figured out how to combine 451 mostly generic parts into a valuable product. They may not make the iPod, but they created it. In the end, that’s what really matters.

Hal R. Varian is a professor of business, economics and information management at the University of California, Berkeley.


Cost accounting on the global scene

Who makes the Apple iPod? Here’s a hint: It is not Apple. The company outsources the entire manufacture of the device to a number of Asian enterprises, among them Asustek, Inventec Appliances and Foxconn.

But this list of companies isn’t a satisfactory answer either: They only do final assembly. What about the 451 parts that go into the iPod? Where are they made and by whom?

Three researchers at the University of California, Irvine — Greg Linden, Kenneth L. Kraemer and Jason Dedrick — applied some investigative cost accounting to this question, using a report from Portelligent Inc. that examined all the parts that went into the iPod.

Their study, sponsored by the Sloan Foundation, offers a fascinating illustration of the complexity of the global economy, and how difficult it is to understand that complexity by using only conventional trade statistics.

The retail value of the 30-gigabyte video iPod that the authors examined was $299. The most expensive component in it was the hard drive, which was manufactured by Toshiba and costs about $73. The next most costly components were the display module (about $20), the video/multimedia processor chip ($8) and the controller chip ($5). They estimated that the final assembly, done in China, cost only about $4 a unit.

One approach to tracing supply chain geography might be to attribute the cost of each component to the country of origin of its maker. So $73 of the cost of the iPod would be attributed to Japan since Toshiba is a Japanese company, and the $13 cost of the two chips would be attributed to the United States, since the suppliers, Broadcom and PortalPlayer, are American companies, and so on.

But this method hides some of the most important details. Toshiba may be a Japanese company, but it makes most of its hard drives in the Philippines and China. So perhaps we should also allocate part of the cost of that hard drive to one of those countries. The same problem arises regarding the Broadcom chips, with most of them manufactured in Taiwan. So how can one distribute the costs of the iPod components across the countries where they are manufactured in a meaningful way?

To answer this question, let us look at the production process as a sequence of steps, each possibly performed by a different company operating in a different country. At each step, inputs like computer chips and a bare circuit board are converted into outputs like an assembled circuit board. The difference between the cost of the inputs and the value of the outputs is the “value added” at that step, which can then be attributed to the country where that value was added.

The profit margin on generic parts like nuts and bolts is very low, since these items are produced in intensely competitive industries and can be manufactured anywhere. Hence, they add little to the final value of the iPod. More specialized parts, like the hard drives and controller chips, have much higher value added.

According to the authors’ estimates, the $73 Toshiba hard drive in the iPod contains about $54 in parts and labor. So the value that Toshiba added to the hard drive was $19 plus its own direct labor costs. This $19 is attributed to Japan since Toshiba is a Japanese company.

Continuing in this way, the researchers examined the major components of the iPod and tried to calculate the value added at different stages of the production process and then assigned that value added to the country where the value was created. This isn’t an easy task, but even based on their initial examination, it is quite clear that the largest share of the value added in the iPod goes to enterprises in the United States, particularly for units sold here.

The researchers estimated that $163 of the iPod’s $299 retail value in the United States was captured by American companies and workers, breaking it down to $75 for distribution and retail costs, $80 to Apple, and $8 to various domestic component makers. Japan contributed about $26 to the value added (mostly via the Toshiba disk drive), while Korea contributed less than $1.

The unaccounted-for parts and labor costs involved in making the iPod came to about $110. The authors hope to assign those labor costs to the appropriate countries, but as the hard drive example illustrates, that’s not so easy to do.

This value added calculation illustrates the futility of summarizing such a complex manufacturing process by using conventional trade statistics. Even though Chinese workers contribute only about 1 percent of the value of the iPod, the export of a finished iPod to the United States directly contributes about $150 to our bilateral trade deficit with the Chinese.

Ultimately, there is no simple answer to who makes the iPod or where it is made. The iPod, like many other products, is made in several countries by dozens of companies, with each stage of production contributing a different amount to the final value.

The real value of the iPod doesn’t lie in its parts or even in putting those parts together. The bulk of the iPod’s value is in the conception and design of the iPod. That is why Apple gets $80 for each of these video iPods it sells, which is by far the largest piece of value added in the entire supply chain.

Those clever folks at Apple figured out how to combine 451 mostly generic parts into a valuable product. They may not make the iPod, but they created it. In the end, that’s what really matters.

Hal R. Varian is a professor of business, economics and information management at the University of California, Berkeley.

Foreign investors prefer Britain


London skyline
Much of the foreign investment is in London and the South East
Britain remains the favourite European destination for foreign investment, according to a report. Read original article.

It won 686 projects in 2006, a 23% rise on the year before and accounting for 19% of all foreign investment deals in Europe, according to Ernst & Young.

More than half of these - 361 - were in London and the South East.

Scotland also fared well in terms of attracting overseas investment, almost doubling the number of deals from 33 in 2005 to 63 in 2006.

The European Investment Monitor found most British investment came from the US, but noted that levels were growing from Brazil, Russia, India and China.

India invests

The overall number of investment projects in Europe grew by more than 15% - from 3,066 in 2005 to 3,531 in 2006 - with western European countries the main beneficiaries.

About 211,000 jobs were created as a result, the report said.

FOREIGN INVESTMENT DEALS
1. UK - 686
2. France - 565
3. Germany - 286
4. Spain - 212
5. Belgium - 185
Figures are for 2006
Source: Ernst & Young

Having previously threatened to overtake the UK as the most popular destination, investment to France grew modestly in 2006, and its percentage share fell.

The importance of India as a foreign investor was one of the key trends to emerge, with the country now the second most important source for inward investment into the UK - growing by 53%, and by 66% into Europe as a whole.

"Indian companies are winning clients from domestic Western European competitors by investing in sales and customer support offices and also software development centres close to their European customers as a means to drive growth," said Ernst & Young's regional development director Nigel Wilcock.

WHO INVESTS?
1. USA - 990 projects
2. Germany - 449 projects
3. UK - 239 projects
4. Japan - 189 projects
5. France - 169 projects
Figures are for 2006
Source: Ernst & Young

"This is actually good news for the UK because not only from an Indian perspective is there a cultural affinity with London and the South East, but the City is at the heart of the European service sector economy."

US firms

The main losers in the report were Poland, Hungary, Russia and the Czech Republic, whose project numbers all fell.

The report's authors put this down to the relative decline in the number of manufacturing projects - saying that companies seeking a low cost base were turning to China and India rather than central and eastern Europe.

However, Romania and Bulgaria both saw major investment ahead of their admission to the European Union.

IBM and Microsoft were the two companies investing most into Europe, the report said, followed by DHL and GlaxoSmithKline.

Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Regulator fears China's boom is a double-edged sword


Financial sector, Shanghai

Modern financial institutions crowd Shanghai's skyline

China's top banking official says that the country's economy needs "rebalancing" after three decades of breakneck growth. Read original article

Liu Mingkang, the head of China's Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) says globalisation has become a "double-edged sword" for China.

Mr Liu, who has played a key role in liberalising China's financial sector, was outlining the challenges of globalisation at a seminar at Oxford University's global economic governance programme.

He says that while globalisation is now an inescapable reality, it presents difficulties as well as opportunities for China's economy.

Opening out

There is no doubt that China has become much richer as a result of opening up to the West since 1978.

Shanghai shoppers enjoy access to Western fashion

Shanghai shoppers want Western affluence

Its economy has grown on average by 9.7% per year, while per capita income in urban areas has grown by 6.7% per year, and trade by a robust 12% per year.

The number of people living on less than $1 (50 pence) per day has dropped dramatically.

In the financial sector, Mr Liu has presided over a series of dramatic changes since the Chinese banking sector faced near-meltdown in 2002.

He has allowed Western banks to take shares in China's main commercial banks, allowed them to set up branches in mainland China, and in April agreed that they could compete directly with Chinese banks for retail customers.

Fundamentally unbalanced

Now he seems ready to allow private equity funds to operate in China to improve the efficient working of the capital markets.

But Mr Liu says that that Chinas' dramatic growth has become fundamentally unbalanced, with personal consumption making up less than 50% of Chinese output (the rest comes from exports and investment).

The export drive has created a very large trade surplus, with the Chinese central bank now holding more than $1 trillion in foreign exchange reserves.

This, he says, has created excess liquidity - too much cash - in the economy, which he accepts has helped to fuel a property boom and now a stock market boom.

The spare cash has also led firms to over-invest, so that in many basic industries such as steel and cement there is vast over-capacity.

The answer, in his view, is to boost domestic consumption, but to do that the government has to overcome some deep-seated fears among the population.

He also wants the banks to be tougher in giving out loans to companies, which still raise most of their investment cash from the banking sector.

The Chinese government shares this view and is also concerned about the growing imbalances between rich and poor, and between the coastal cities and the rural interior of the country.

However, so far attempts by the government to slow the investment boom have had only limited success.

Too many savers

Mr Liu is also concerned that Chinese citizens are saving too much and spending too little.

Liu Mingkang wants to liberalise China's financial markets

Liu Mingkang wants to liberalise China's financial markets

He argues that the underlying reason for this is the removal of the social safety net that used to exist when China's state-owned firms provided jobs-for-life, pensions, health care and housing for their workers.

Now, according to Mr Liu, the Chinese government spends much less on health and education (as a percentage of GDP) than other countries at a similar level of development, such as India and the Philippines.

He argues that the government needs to increase its spending on social security in order to give people the confidence that the state will still be able to meet many of their future needs and therefore free them to spend more in the present.

He believes that liberalising the financial system, improving the retail banking sector and making it easier to get personal loans and credit cards, could help to spread prosperity.

Talent search

But for China's top regulator, the biggest challenge is to find the talented individuals who will be the next generation of experts and reformers.

Mr Liu says that it is becoming increasingly difficult to recruit highly educated and dedicated people to work in the public sector, as the lure and glamour of the private sector has increased in China.

This is a problem faced by many developing countries.

Mr Liu's generation of technocrats was one of the first to be educated in the West and to be exposed to Western business practices.

Mr Liu, who was head of the Bank of China, the country's second largest bank, worked for three years in London.

But the next generation, including the dozens of Oxford University students from China who turned up to hear Mr Liu, the temptation to stay in the West might prove irresistible.

This is one of a series of articles on how globalisation is transforming China. Future articles will look at the problems of pollution and migrant labour.

Grant Thornton forms China group...


A special group to deal with the expanding business between the UK and China has been created by the mid-tier accountancy firm Grant Thornton, reports Accountancy Magazine. Read original article

Chinese companies that are trying to raise funds in the UK through an initial public offering or establish themselves through organic growth will be able to seek advice and help from the group.

UK companies that wish to expand into China will also be helped by the group.

China group head Stephen Weatherseed said: "There is a range of long held traditions influencing business in modern China, varying from region to region within this vast nation.

"We pride ourselves on having the knowledge and understanding to provide business advice that helps to negotiate these sometimes delicate situations."

By 2050 a full 27 per cent of the global GDP will originate in China, according to a recent forecast by Grant Thornton.

China is test bed for new ad techniques

China and other Asian media markets are likely to turn into exporters to the West of advertising on mobile and other interactive media over the coming year, executives at international media buying groups predicted on Monday. Read original article.

Experts believe the scale of markets such as China, and the proliferation of groups that own assets across different media classes, is encouraging Western brands to develop new marketing techniques which they will later bring to Europe and the US.

Opportunities to test mobile advertising, which has been slow to develop in Europe, are seen as particularly strong in the region.

Sprite, the soft drink brand owned by Coca-Cola, is about to launch in the US a version of a mobile-based social networking service, Sprite Yard, first developed in China. Aegis, the UK-listed media buying group which developed the campaign, plans to roll out the service to eight markets by end of next year in a bid to make it the first international attempt to provide a social networking service on mobiles.

Nigel Morris, chief executive of Isobar, the Aegis division which produced Sprite Yard, said Isobar had already developed a Chinese content website for Coca-Cola which had amassed 35m subscribers. The site, Icoke, is thought to be the most popular global web property of the US drinks group.

Speaking to the FT at the Cannes Lions International Advertising Festival, Mr Morris said: “People look at the apparently low level of internet penetration in China and assume that the digital market is going to be relatively unsophisticated, but it really is not.”

Zenith Optimedia, part of Publicis, the Paris-listed marketing services group, also argues that the sheer scale of the Chinese market – Zenith forecasts that the number of online gamers in China will exceed the total UK population next year – could make it a valuable development base for skills and practices destined to be brought to Western markets at a later date.

In some instances, consumers have “leapfrogged” Western consumers’ conventional technological progression, moving straight to mobile without having first owned a fixed line service, or directly to broadband internet access without any experience of dial-up web surfing.

John Taylor, worldwide director of client services at Zenith Optimedia, which works for advertisers such as L’Oreal in China said: “There is a lot of talk in europe about advertisers using mobile coupons or advertising, but when you go to places like China and south Korea, the consumers are actually doing it already.”

In Western markets, development of mobile advertising has been hampered by the technical and commercial difficulties of finding partnerships between the advertiser, the mobile operator and consumers, who may be deterred if they are charged for replying to campaigns using text messages.

Chinese Mobile Industry Reaching New Highs


China's economy is thriving with the booming mobile phone market, as the number of subscribers continues to rise.

Government statistics reveal the likelihood of the number of China's mobile phone subscribers exceeding 500 million by the end of June. The website of China's Ministry of Information Industry reported a 6.7 million increase from March to 487.4 million mobile phone subscribers in China at the end of April. PC World published news of the addition of 6.8 million new subscribers in February in China. Read original article

PC World news quoted Jason Yin, the managing director of In-Stat China identifying lower service costs for fuelling this growth. Chinese operators have dropped the Bi-directional-calling charges, thereby sparing users from paying for incoming calls. On-going discussions aim to do away with roaming charges within China.

The country's mobile market is also benefiting from the steady entry of foreign mobile phone companies in China. The handset market witnessed the establishment and current dominance of foreign makers including Motorola, Nokia and Ericsson. Top handset manufacturers like Motorola and Nokia are attempting market expansion with the introduction of low cost phones, boosting competition. The government is doing its bit by increasing licenses for manufacturing handsets.

The growing affluence of China's middle class, and tech savvy youngsters are primary reasons for companies like Nokia and Motorola investing billions of dollars for setting up manufacturing and distribution networks on the Chinese mainland.

China's subscriber growth has mainly been in urban areas like Shenzhen, Beijing and Shanghai. However rural market is also said to have become the fastest growing sector last year with nearly half the increase in last year's subscribers resulting from the rural market enlargement thanks to initiatives in developing services and products aimed at rural customers.

A RNCOS research analyst feels that the current growth of mobile usage bodes well for the Chinese economy. Spiraling subscriber rates have pushed up value-added mobile service usage as well. For instance text messaging or short-message service (SMS) is currently booming in China. Thanks to this unprecedented growth, China's mobile services providers have great potential for escalating profits.

China - Helping the web become world wide


Google China home page, AFP/Getty

Language barriers have stymied some Western web firms

Although the web has permeated almost 250 nations, everywhere from Ascension Island to Zimbabwe, the language of online life is by no means as diverse. Read original article.

Take, for instance, domain names such as www.bbc.co.uk. For a long time only Roman characters could be used in domains even if a nation's native language used none of those letters.

Now international domains are getting more widely used to help people get to grips with the web in their own language.

Core control

China has been at the forefront of the efforts to use international domain names. In 2006 it started seriously promoting three Chinese language domain names: gongsi (.com), wangluo (.net) and zhongguo (China).

"China has a long term vision for the project, they are very persistent and they know what they want," said Subramanian Subbiah, co-founder of I-DNS.net, who has worked with China on the native language domains.

The nation's aims have been boosted by the fact that during 2007 all the most popular web browsers will have support for the Chinese character set built in.

It is keen to drive adoption of the native language domains for very simple reasons, said Mr Subbiah.

"Chinese domain names will controlled by China," he said. "Other domains, like .com, are controlled by other countries and they do not like that."

The project seems to be working, he said, because native language domains are being snapped up three times faster by Chinese people than those using the Roman character set were.

China has even seen the start of cyber-squatting in which speculators buy up domains in the hope that they will prove lucrative in the future.

Research suggests that the names have captured the interest of younger Chinese net users who know few words of English.

Net use in Saudi Arabia, AP

Arabic nations are banding together on multilingual domains

This also helps to explain, said Mr Subbiah, why native web businesses such as Baidu are outperforming Western web behemoths such as Google.

"Google means nothing in the Chinese language," he said, "but Baidu does mean something in Chinese characters."

Analysis of who uses Google in China shows if people can spell it they use it. But, he said, the vast majority who can't spell it use the home-grown Baidu.

The success of China's work on international domains has prompted South Korea and many Arabic nations to push on with their own projects to create native language domains.

Travelling text

International domain names are all about helping one nation's citizens get more out of the web. The flipside of this, and potentially more important goal, is translating what people are saying to make the web a universal medium.

"The great thing about the internet is that it is a great leveller," said Dr Chris Boorman of translation firm SDL.

The common technology of the net, he said, should mean that any firm, be they based in Barnsley or Beijing, has the same chance to win a customer's business no matter where that person lives.

At first, he said, this just meant that Western firms which were quicker to get online could grab customers on other shores.

Mauritius, BBC

Travel firm GTA has a daily need to translate text

But increasingly, said Mr Boorman, those native web firms are flexing their muscle, taking on Western rivals and reaching out to new markets.

"Two years ago our China office spent most of its time translating English to Chinese," he said. "Now 50% of its business is Chinese to English."

The web has made everyone realise, said Mr Boorman, that almost all business is global business and that handling that, if only to keep control of brands, advertising and image, will become more important.

Travel firm GTA feels this problem more acutely than most as it operates in about 140 countries. The information it prepares about the villas, hotels and holiday homes it manages for travel firms has to be translated into 27 languages so it reaches as wide an audience as possible.

Every day, said Laurie Myers, a spokesperson for GTA, tens of thousands of words in that corpus of information needs changinPublier le message blogg and updating.

"It's an enormous volume of translation and text that has to be distributed, corrected and then re-distributed back to our sites," she said.

"Speed is important as well as reach," she said, "but what never seems to change is for the local booker to understand and relate to the text in his own language."

"This is not a matter of expanding," said Ms Myers "it is just about taking care of daily business."

Murdoch, News corp - On Charming China


BEIJING, June 25 — Many big companies have sought to break into the Chinese market over the past two decades, but few of them have been as ardent and unrelenting as Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Read original article.


Enlarge This Image

Chris Pizzello/Reuters

Rupert and Wendi Murdoch at a Hollywood party in February.

· Times Topics: Rupert Murdoch

A receptionist at the News Corporation’s offices in Beijing. Television channels affiliated with Rupert Murdoch beam more programming into China than any other foreign media group.

Mr. Murdoch has flattered Communist Party leaders and done business with their children. His Fox News network helped China’s leading state broadcaster develop a news Web site. He joined hands with the Communist Youth League, a power base in the ruling party, in a risky television venture, his China managers and advisers say.

Mr. Murdoch’s third wife, Wendi, is a mainland Chinese who once worked for his Hong Kong-based satellite broadcaster, Star TV. Her role in managing investments and honing elite connections in China has underscored uncertainties within the Murdoch family about how the family-controlled News Corporation will be run after Mr. Murdoch, 76, retires or dies.

Regulatory barriers and management missteps have thwarted Mr. Murdoch’s hopes of big profits in China. He has said his local business hit a “brick wall” after a bid to corral prime-time broadcasting rights fell apart in 2005, costing him tens of millions of dollars.

But as he seeks to buy Dow Jones, the parent company of The Wall Street Journal, his track record in China has attracted attention less because of profits and losses than for what it shows about his management style.

Mr. Murdoch cooperates closely with China’s censors and state broadcasters, several people who worked for him in China say. He cultivates political ties that he hopes will insulate his business ventures from regulatory interference, these people say.

In speeches and interviews, Mr. Murdoch often supports the policies of Chinese leaders and attacks their critics. A group of China-based reporters for The Journal accused him in a letter to Dow Jones shareholders of “sacrificing journalistic integrity to satisfy personal and political aims,” a charge the News Corporation denies.

His courtship has made him the Chinese leadership’s favorite foreign media baron. He has dined with former President Jiang Zemin in the Zhongnanhai leadership compound in Beijing and repeatedly met other members of the ruling Politburo in Beijing, New York and London. Television channels affiliated with Mr. Murdoch beam more programming into China than any other foreign media group.

“The reality is that the Chinese government is not going to let anything radical happen in media,” says Gary Davey, an Australian who once ran Star TV for Mr. Murdoch. “But we got a lot farther than anyone else did.”

News Corporation officials in Beijing and Hong Kong declined to comment for this article. After The New York Times began a two-part series on Monday about how Mr. Murdoch operates his company, the News Corporation issued a statement:

“News Corp. has consistently cooperated with The New York Times in its coverage of the company. However, the agenda for this unprecedented series is so blatantly designed to further the Times’s commercial self interests — by undermining a direct competitor poised to become an even more formidable competitor — that it would be reckless of us to participate in their malicious assault. Ironically, The Times, by using its news pages to advance its own corporate business agenda, is doing the precise thing they accuse us of doing without any evidence.”

China has never been a make-or-break proposition for the News Corporation, since its operations here represent a small part of the company, which is valued at $68 billion. But Mr. Murdoch pushed for nearly 15 years to create a satellite television network that would cover every major market in the world, including China.

He coveted the $50 billion in ad spending that flows mainly to China’s state-owned news media whose products, even after years of improvements, still reflect propaganda directives as well as consumer demand.

The News Corporation’s competitors in television and film, the Walt Disney Company, Viacom and Time Warner, also had to accommodate Chinese demands as the price of admission to the local market.

But Mr. Murdoch gave more, his associates said.

“The Chinese discovered that Rupert was a real emperor who controlled everything himself,” said H. S. Liu, who oversaw government relations for the News Corporation in China. “His rivals had big, cautious bureaucracies that could not always deliver.”

China has long meant more than business to the Murdoch clan. Mr. Murdoch’s father, Keith, wrote about China as a war correspondent in the 1930s. As a newspaper proprietor in Australia, he collected Ming dynasty porcelain.

Pool photo by Mark Terrill

Jiang Zemin, then president of China, meeting with Mr. Murdoch in 1997.

When Rupert Murdoch visited Shanghai in 1997, Wendi Deng, then a junior News Corporation employee in Hong Kong, flew up to serve as his translator. Together they explored Shanghai, which was then emerging as a lively center of finance and commerce.

“He was knocked over by the place,” recalled Bruce Dover, a former China manager for Mr. Murdoch, “and by her.” Within two years, Mr. Murdoch had left his second wife, Anna Mann, and married Ms. Deng.

Clawing Back

Mr. Murdoch’s initial foray into China was disastrous. Shortly after he purchased the satellite broadcaster Star TV in Hong Kong for nearly $1 billion in 1993, he made a speech in London that enraged the Chinese leadership.

He said that modern communications technology had “proved an unambiguous threat to totalitarian regimes everywhere.” Star could beam programming to every corner of China, and Murdoch had paid a big premium for the broadcaster for that reason.

Prime Minister Li Peng promptly outlawed private ownership of satellite dishes, which had once proliferated on rooftops. Star TV faced a threat to its viability.

Chinese leaders rebuffed his attempts to apologize in person — a ban that lasted nearly four years. But he sought to placate them. One target was Deng Xiaoping, then retired but still China’s senior leader.

HarperCollins, Mr. Murdoch’s book unit, published a biography of Mr. Deng written by his daughter, Deng Rong. Although it mainly recycled propaganda about Mr. Deng, Mr. Murdoch threw an elaborate book party at Le Cirque in New York. The book sold poorly.

He also cultivated ties with Mr. Deng’s eldest son, Deng Pufang, who is disabled. Mr. Murdoch chartered a jet to ferry a troop of disabled acrobats that the younger Mr. Deng had promoted to perform abroad, according to a former News Corporation official.

Star TV overhauled its programming to suit Chinese tastes. In 1994 it dropped BBC News, which had frequently angered Chinese officials with its reports on mainland affairs.

Mr. Murdoch said the decision was made for business reasons, not political reasons. Mr. Davey, who then ran Star TV, agreed that cost was a primary consideration.

But he said he had pressed the British broadcaster to stop showing a video of a man facing down a tank outside Tiananmen Square — an indelible image from China’s crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in 1989 — during its on-air programming breaks. He said the BBC refused, calling the video a “journalistic presentation.”

“The BBC never got the sensitivities of the situation,” Mr. Davey said. “It was relentless and stupid. Neither party was too upset about ending the relationship.”

If Star was a potential threat to the one-party state, it was also a new opportunity. Chinese officials disliked Western news media coverage of China and wanted to present their own face to the world. Mr. Murdoch provided the access they wanted.

In 1996, he entered a joint venture with Liu Changle, a onetime radio host for the People’s Liberation Army who had connections with propaganda officials. Their joint news and entertainment channel, called Phoenix, beamed programs to the small number of urban households permitted to see foreign broadcasts in China. Mr. Murdoch transmitted the same programming around the world on his satellites.

Phoenix imitated the fast pace and on-the-scene reporting style popular in the West and shook up the mainland’s staid news media, which still featured well-coiffed narrators reading scripts about meetings between senior leaders held that day. But Phoenix also tended to steer clear of the most sensitive political topics and could be bombastically nationalistic.

Phoenix may have demonstrated that the Chinese news media could become more sophisticated and dynamic without threatening the party’s power. It also showed that Mr. Murdoch could be an asset.

“Officials realized he had a good intentions,” Mr. Liu said.

After Phoenix proved a hit, Ding Guangen, a hard-liner who exercised sweeping control over all Chinese news media as chief of the country’s Propaganda Department, granted Mr. Murdoch his first meeting. So did Zhu Rongji, then the prime minister.

Mr. Zhu noted that Mr. Murdoch had become an American citizen to comply with television ownership rules in the United States. He joked that if he wanted to broadcast more in China, he should consider becoming Chinese, a person who attended the meeting recalled.

Friendly Relations

The News Corporation’s outreach intensified. When Mr. Murdoch learned that China Central Television, known as CCTV, was struggling to develop a news Web site, he dispatched a team from Fox News to help design and operate one. Another News Corporation team brought People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Communist Party, online.

China also needed help encrypting satellite transmissions so it could develop a pay-TV service, a specialty of the News Corporation’s NDS subsidiary. NDS helped Beijing create a proprietary encryption system. It never realized sizable royalties, people who worked at the News Corporation said.

Similarly, the company brought delegations of Chinese officials to Britain, so they could study how Mr. Murdoch’s BSkyB unit had become a lucrative gateway for satellite television in Europe.

“Our thinking was that we would show off our technology and they would contract News Corporation to do the same for them,” said Mr. Dover, Mr. Murdoch’s former China manager. “Their thinking was, ‘We want this for ourselves.’ ”

“It ended being more of a giveaway,” Mr. Dover said.

In late 1998, President Jiang invited Mr. Murdoch to Zhongnanhai. The official Xinhua news agency, reporting on the session, made clear that the media baron had a new reputation.

“President Jiang expressed appreciation for the efforts made by world media mogul Rupert Murdoch in presenting China objectively and cooperating with the Chinese press over the last two years,” Xinhua said.

The Murdochs often echoed the Chinese government line. In a 1999 interview with Vanity Fair, Mr. Murdoch spoke disparagingly of the Dalai Lama, whom the Chinese condemn as a separatist. “I have heard cynics who say he is a very political old monk shuffling around in Gucci shoes,” he said.

James Murdoch, who ran Star TV from 2000 to 2003, said in a speech in Los Angeles in 2001 that Western reporters in China supported “destabilizing forces” that are “very, very dangerous for the Chinese government.” He lashed out at the Falun Gong spiritual sect, which had just endured brutal repression in China, calling it “dangerous and apocalyptic.”

The Journal won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the suppression of the Falun Gong movement in 2001. Last month, seven China-based reporters for The Journal wrote a letter to Dow Jones’s current controlling shareholders arguing that the articles on Falun Gong “may never have seen the light of day” if The Journal had been owned by Mr. Murdoch.

News Corporation officials say such fears are baseless. While several reporters who worked in China for the company’s publications in the 1990s say Mr. Murdoch’s editors pressed them to tone down their coverage of delicate issues that could anger the Chinese leadership, reporters serving in such posts now say they have not come under similar pressures.

By the late 1990s, Mr. Murdoch was traveling several times a year to the country. He was often joined by Wendi Murdoch, who left her formal position in the company but continued to scout for investments in China and participate in strategy decisions there, several people who worked for the News Corporation said.

One of her roles: introducing her husband to Chinese entrepreneurs. Many of them had received business degrees in the United States, as she had at Yale.

The Murdochs invested about $150 million in half a dozen start-up Internet and telecom companies at the height of the Internet bubble between 1999 and 2001. Only one, Netcom, returned an appreciable investment profit, two former News Corporation executives said.

But one of the entrepreneurs the Murdochs befriended during the investment spree was Jiang Mianheng, the son of President Jiang. Ms. Murdoch and some other News Corporation employees argued internally that the younger Mr. Jiang could help Star distribute its broadcasts more widely, two former News Corporation executives said.

It is unclear what role, if any, Mr. Jiang played. But in 2002, the company became the first foreign broadcaster to receive “landing rights” to sell programs to cable systems in Guangdong Province, near Hong Kong.

The license came with a catch. The News Corporation again consented to transmit Chinese programs — this time, the English-language news, talk shows and cultural shows on CCTV’s Channel 9 — to the United States and Britain. Time Warner later agreed to similar terms. But the market appeared to be opening, with the News Corporation in the lead.

Prime Time

The News Corporation and its joint venture partners controlled 9 of the 31 foreign channels, including news, movies, music videos and sports, more than any other foreign media company. Officially, however, it could still reach only government and foreign compounds and luxury hotels, as well as homes in Guangdong. Mr. Murdoch wanted more.

Good news appeared to come in 2004. The authorities began allowing Chinese-foreign joint ventures to produce shows that could be broadcast locally without the restrictions that apply to overseas content.

Mr. Murdoch interpreted the order liberally. The News Corporation allied itself with a state-run broadcaster in the western province of Qinghai. The arrangement covered not only production but also distribution. Through middlemen, the News Corporation also purchased prime-time slots in 25 Chinese provinces. It had become a backdoor national broadcaster.

Aware that the venture pushed the limits of what regulators allowed, the News Corporation sought to arrange political cover, people involved in arranging the deal said. It recruited a media and stock market entrepreneur named Ding Yuchen to join the venture as a partner. Mr. Ding’s father, Ding Guangen, was the longtime propaganda chief. A second partner was the Central Committee of the Communist Youth League, considered the political power base of China’s new top leader, Hu Jintao.

In comments to News Corporation investors in early 2005, Mr. Murdoch boasted of a “new venture,” which he did not name, “where we’ll have nearly 50 percent of a prime-time channel, which will have access to well over 100 million homes.”

It did not endure. The News Corporation used Qinghai to broadcast branded shows it had produced for its own, more limited channel. When they began appearing nationally, competitors complained that Mr. Murdoch was getting special treatment.

The Propaganda Department forced the News Corporation to end its involvement with Qinghai shortly thereafter. The cost of the debacle: between $30 million and $60 million, people connected to the company at the time said.

News Corporation executives said they felt the political winds had shifted against them. President Jiang, who retired from his final post as military chief in 2004, had lost much of his day-to-day influence. President Hu’s propaganda team pulled in the reins. Mr. Murdoch said publicly that he had hit a “brick wall.”

Mr. Liu, Mr. Murdoch’s partner at Phoenix, said the Qinghai venture “is not something I would have tried” because it ran afoul of media regulations. But he said Mr. Murdoch had not lost the good will of senior officials. “They still recognize his contributions,” he said.

When Mr. Murdoch visited China late last year, he met Liu Yunshan, Mr. Ding’s successor as propaganda chief, and Liu Qi, the party secretary of Beijing and the top coordinator for the 2008 Olympics.

The News Corporation also entered an alliance with China Mobile, the state-owned company that is the world’s largest mobile communications operator. Mr. Liu of Phoenix said the move “could open a new, lucrative highway” to provide media content to China’s 480 million mobile-phone users.

Wendi Murdoch has stepped up her role in China. She plotted a strategy for the News Corporation’s social networking site, MySpace, to enter the Chinese market, people involved with the company said. The News Corporation decided to license the MySpace name to a local consortium of investors organized by Ms. Murdoch.

As a local venture, MySpace China, which began operations in the spring, abides by domestic censorship laws and the “self discipline” regime that governs proprietors of Chinese Web sites. Every page on the site has a link allowing users or monitors to “report inappropriate information” to the authorities. Microsoft, Google and Yahoo have made similar accommodations for their Web sites in China.

The Murdochs will soon be able to call Beijing home. Workers have nearly finished renovating their traditional courtyard-style house in Beijing’s exclusive Beichizi district, a block from the Forbidden City. Beneath the steep-pitched roofs and wooden eaves of freshly coated vermillion and gold, the courtyard has an underground swimming pool and billiard room, according to people who have seen the design.

Plainclothes security officers linger on the street outside. One neighbor is the retired prime minister, Mr. Zhu, who invited Mr. Murdoch to become Chinese.

Danone faces Chinese legal threat


Wahaha bottled water on sale in Beijing store

Wahaha is a well-known brand name in China

China's largest soft drinks maker, Wahaha, has threatened to counter-sue French firm Danone in an escalating dispute between the two firms. Read original article.

Danone is suing Wahaha, accusing it of illegally selling copies of its drinks, and Wahaha has now responded with a threat of its own lawsuit.

Wahaha and Danone have been partners since 1996 but their relationship has deteriorated in recent months.

Wahaha founder Zong Qinghou recently quit as boss of their joint business.

Bottle battle

Mr Zong said he was leaving Wahaha Joint Ventures because Danone had harmed his reputation.

We have reliable evidence of their violations

Wahaha statement

Now the multimillionaire businessman has threatened to pursue Danone for damages, claiming the French firm has violated the terms of their agreement.

"Danone has no evidence of legal violations by us," the Chinese company said.

"We have reliable evidence of their violations and will pursue their illegal activities according to the law."

Mr Zong has described Danone's lawsuit, lodged in the US, as "despicable and laughable".

In response, Danone has accused Mr Zong of "inappropriate behaviour" while stressing that it believed an "amicable settlement" was still possible.

Strain

Under the terms of their 11-year agreement, Wahaha is prohibited from making products that compete with Danone's range.

Danone recently agreed to invest a further four billion yuan (£262m; $519m) in the deal, in return for control over several Wahaha subsidiaries and the right to sell foodstuffs under the Wahaha brand.

It is these subsidiaries that make the disputed products.

Mr Zong founded Wahaha in 1987, selling milk products from a school store.

The Danone deal enabled Wahaha to invest in advanced production facilities, doubling its output between 1996 and 1997.

With its headquarters in Hangzhou in eastern China, Wahaha has 70 subsidiaries spread across 40 manufacturing sites